Fokker C.V-M26 for FSX and FS2004

Fokker C.V-M26 for FSX and FS2004

Ooops
download link is gone
Ooops
download link is gone

License:Freeware

Total downloads:29

Operating system:Windows XP / 7 / 10 / 11

Latest version:1.10

Latest update:

Screenshot

Screenshot

Description

The Fokker C.V-M26 for FSX and FS2004 is an impressive Games utility developed by Perfect Flight. This airplane simulation is based on the historical Fokker C.V-M26, which made its renowned flight from Copenhagen to Tokyo and back in 1926, piloted by A.P. Botved and mechanic C.J.C. Olsen. This aircraft was acclaimed for its versatility, being used for reconnaissance, light bombing, and as a two-seat fighter, and could be equipped with various engines and wing configurations.

The latest version, 1.10, encompasses all the meticulous details of this iconic aircraft, ensuring a rich and immersive experience for aviation enthusiasts. The program also has a previous version, 1.1, which laid the foundation for its current capabilities.

Fokker C.V-M26 for FSX and FS2004 stands out in the Utilities subcategory by providing users with a highly detailed and historically significant flight simulation experience. It is compatible with widely used operating systems such as Windows XP, 7, 10, and 11, thus catering to a broad user base.

The fact that the program is available for free download adds tremendous value, making it accessible to a vast audience looking for realistic and engaging flight simulations without financial constraints.

Pros:

  • Free download, offering high value without cost.
  • Highly detailed simulation of a historic aircraft.
  • Compatible with multiple versions of Windows (XP/7/10/11).
  • Developed by Perfect Flight, ensuring quality and reliability.
More

You may want to check out more software, such as HMS Bounty FSX & P3D & FS2004, Martin M130 for FSX or FS2004 or Short Empire for FSX or FS2004, which might be similar to Fokker C.V-M26 for FSX and FS2004.

Comments

Thank you for rating the program!
Please add a comment explaining the reasoning behind your vote.
Your vote: